see rise is 1.44 mm/yr linear and not accelerating. The tide gauges are accurate and reliable. The Jason 5 satellite has a minimum resolution of 25 mm/ measuring a 3.3 mm/yr rise as unreliable data. The Jason 5 has a 1-millimeter minimum resolution. However, it was bench marked with the unreliable Jason 3 data. See ocean data on cctruth.org
Calling it "unreliable data" is excessively generous. It is an estimate expressed with unjustified precision. The acceleration estimate precision is even less justified.
Approximately 100 millimeters rise in just over 30 years (or just under 4 inches).
Two things:
1. How much sea level floor rise is occurring from geological activity tectonic plates lifting and from sediment deposition from biological decay and from continuous streams and rivers bringing sediment into the oceans?
2. Several folks have documented historical water marks on coastal areas compared to present day water levels.some are as old as 100 years. Personally, I have documented the sea level of my family’s 80 year old beach-front property. There’s no perceptible change.
Given the narrative of sea level catastrophic rise, why are insurance companies continuing to insure structures and property in these locations and why are local, county and state governmental bodies continuing to allow construction for new structures or remodeling of existing structures?
It sure seems like it has to be about the money (property taxes).
The demise of RCP8.5 should mark the end of the catastrophe narrative.
NASA claims it can "estimate" sea level within 3-4 millimeters, reports annual sea level rise of 3-4 millimeters and then reports annual acceleration of 0.075 millimeters. Seems like a case of excessive precision, or excessive hubris.
see rise is 1.44 mm/yr linear and not accelerating. The tide gauges are accurate and reliable. The Jason 5 satellite has a minimum resolution of 25 mm/ measuring a 3.3 mm/yr rise as unreliable data. The Jason 5 has a 1-millimeter minimum resolution. However, it was bench marked with the unreliable Jason 3 data. See ocean data on cctruth.org
Calling it "unreliable data" is excessively generous. It is an estimate expressed with unjustified precision. The acceleration estimate precision is even less justified.
Approximately 100 millimeters rise in just over 30 years (or just under 4 inches).
Two things:
1. How much sea level floor rise is occurring from geological activity tectonic plates lifting and from sediment deposition from biological decay and from continuous streams and rivers bringing sediment into the oceans?
2. Several folks have documented historical water marks on coastal areas compared to present day water levels.some are as old as 100 years. Personally, I have documented the sea level of my family’s 80 year old beach-front property. There’s no perceptible change.
Given the narrative of sea level catastrophic rise, why are insurance companies continuing to insure structures and property in these locations and why are local, county and state governmental bodies continuing to allow construction for new structures or remodeling of existing structures?
It sure seems like it has to be about the money (property taxes).
The demise of RCP8.5 should mark the end of the catastrophe narrative.
NASA claims it can "estimate" sea level within 3-4 millimeters, reports annual sea level rise of 3-4 millimeters and then reports annual acceleration of 0.075 millimeters. Seems like a case of excessive precision, or excessive hubris.