Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Stephen Andrews's avatar

Any responsible electrical engineer could have predicted the risk associated with a lack of grid inertia and would have recommended a threshold limit on renewables. This did not fit with the net zero myth so it has been ignored. This demonstrates how idealogical narratives influence mankind.

Expand full comment
Gene Nelson, Ph.D.'s avatar

These are all good questions Ed. For well over a year, Californians for Green Nuclear Power (CGNP) has been working to answer them. Based on our analysis, the California electric power grid is very close to a harmful "tipping point." In 2022, one quarter of all significant electric power outages occurred in California. One of the contributing factors is the large amount of inverter-based resources (solar, wind, and batteries) that contribute negligible amounts of synchronous grid inertia to the California power grid.. Sufficient SGI is required to maintain grid frequency stability. Here are a pair of relevant articles from CGNP's GreenNUKE Substack:

From March 4, 2024, "Why is Grid Inertia Important? Without sufficient synchronous grid inertia, the grid becomes unstable and a blackout occurs."

https://greennuke.substack.com/p/why-is-grid-inertia-important

From July 8, 2025: "The Spanish Version of the 'Duck Curve' is a real killer - This curve underscores the problem of insufficient synchronous grid inertia in Spain on April 28, 2025"

https://greennuke.substack.com/p/the-spanish-version-of-the-duck-curve

As a public interest Intervenor, CGNP is raising these important points with the California Public Utilities Commission in the current Diablo Canyon Proceeding. Our most recent filing was accepted for adjudication on July 11, 2025.

https://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Efile/G000/M572/K574/572574480.PDF

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts