Discussion about this post

User's avatar
John Droz's avatar

Ed: My apologies, but I don't buy it. I did read through the paper cited, and it said that it based its conclusions on "seasonal and inter-annual" variations. Huh? What happened to second-by-second variations, as the Grid is stabilized on intervals like that. And since just solar is at zero for 30+% EVERY DAY, (excluding clouds, etc.) how can 25% make any sense? The proper answer is that Wind and Solar require 100% augmentation.

If you want empirical proof (not some "peer-reviewed" paper), strip all electric power sources off any Hawaiin Island. The replace it with the equal capacity factored wind and solar, and see exactly how much augmentation is needed to provide a guaranteed equivalent of today. (Hint: 100%)

Robert Simmers's avatar

What's to worry ? We print our own currency. Ergo, there is no price too high that we can't inflate our way into it.

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?